Kylie minogue breast cancer, surface lake bell, nip slip lady gaga,

Shemique · Guest

I remember seeing this a couple years a go and not being very impressed. We made better stuff in school in 2002 and on $0.00 budget. Granted the films my school makes are only 15-20 mins in length but still.Personally I like the Pink 5 series the best.
thumbnail looked like closeup of 70s porno

Zandro · Guest

“Dugg for Danzig....bwaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahhahhahhha!

Deiavion · Guest

You guys know there is a big difference between fear-mongering and being cautious right?The possibility that H1N1 could mutate into a being a lethal killer is real. No scientists have ever disputed this to my knowledge.So wash your damn hands and stay clean..
It looks like an orthopedic shoe!

Robeela · Guest

It sucks that these studies will spawn even more crap movies. Yeah, sequels are good when they continue the original story, but if the 1st movie is meant to just set up a sequel then you movie people can suck it. I love seeing movies on the big screen, but I'm not an idiot and I can spot a shill from a mile away... How about making one good movie (eg: Star Wars, it's a 3 act idea that was worth it) instead of making an "act 1" movie (eg: Spiderman, made to sucker you into seeing part 2)? It's like music albums that contain 1-2 good songs and a bunch of filler; yeah, I have to keep buying that bands albums to get the good stuff but I still feel ripped off. Originality is not something to be fearful of, it's something to be proud of! Please (commercial studios) start making good movies that we only want to see once but are willing to pay for, or else suffer the wrath of bittorrent the same way the music industry is (like it's not already happening to you, psss!).?
Thank God for Ron Paul

Giselda · Guest

As a big Marvel Comic fan - I am sad to see the comics jump the shark

Soebrati · Guest

Removal of CO2 and storing it in rocks is not an option. There are no viable schemes to remove significant amounts of CO2 from the atmosphere; injecting CO2 into the ocean is sometimes suggested, but the result is acidification, which in all probability will be a bigger problem globally than the warming anyway, so it doesn't solve anything.Feasible geoengineering options fall into two camps: increasing earth albedo (making the surface of earth more reflective), or decreasing solar input (increasing cloud coverage). _At best_ these will produce a band-aid solution allowing CO2 to rise to a higher level before we're absolutely forced to do anything about emissions, but more likely they'll shift weather patterns in unpredictable ways and reduce plant growth all over the world.

Amos Talmor · Guest

48.5%? Jesus ***** Christ...

Meakie · Guest

!

lance bass shirtless