Kyra sedgwick, what did lance armstrong achieve, leann rimes cheating,
lauren conrad hot, lauren conrad mtv
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

kyra sedgwick

 
Post new topic      kyra sedgwick -> kylie minogue hot
PostPosted: 10 17 2009    Post subject: laura vandervoort smallville kara space Reply with quote
@j035u5Because they now have much less succesful shows in preferential time-slots.Well that's not really a reason, is it? I was trying to point out precisely how senseless fox is.But I'll give you the explanation you seek (and this goes for all tv channels, but it's specially an issue in Fox because it's not been the first and certainly not the last epic show they've cancelled for no good reason (that they hadn'r provoked), and most of them even had great audiences:As I understand, every x amount of time fox execs are changed. This is mainly due to calm down the shareholders who want someone to be sacrificed when the network if not doing great on ratings (which is normally isn't).So every new exec get to approve new shows, right? some of them become their pet shows, the one's they're supposed to set them apart from the previous execs and help them maintain their position for longer. But then they have the problem that previous execs' pet shows are on the best time slots, and they can't just go and cancel their best audienced shows, that'd be carreer suicide...So what they do is move them around. It doesn't really matter too much to where, but their final destination is always friday nights. Where they lose ***** of viewers and that's how they get them cancelled. And put their own (more often crappy than not) pet shows on neutral time slots, and with time end up moving them to the best slots. But since they're not usually the GREATEST of shows, they don't do great compared to other networks, and alas, he is fired, a new exec is promoted and the cycle starts all over again. They couldn't care less not only about the viewers, but also about the actual wellbeing of the company. Shareholders don't undertand time slots, they don't get what show would make it. They don't make direct decisions. They hire someone who they think will do the best job possible. Arrested Develpment, I agree, may not have been super-mainstream, but they have a HUGE fanbase, die-hard and crazy loyal. I wouldn't know about all the advertisement, since I (like MANY others) found out about it when it was already cancelled. There is DEFINITELY a place for shows like that on TV (check battlestar galactica and similars). AD is not the best example, but other shows that WERE very mainstream also got cancelled. T:TSCC had lost viewers due to slacker writers, but it definitely started out good, and sure as hell ended up well. If it hadn't been cancelled I can bet you the 3rd season premiere would have beaten records.I could go on about other shows, but I'm sure many would do a better job. Firefly has also kind of niche, but could have definitely used the help of some promotion to younger audiences. The Serenity movie and DVD sales prove how succesful they could have been if they had been managed by less clueless and self-absorbed execs...Bah, whatever... broadcast tv is definitely not going to stay the same, and I predict as decisions are taken away from white-collar execs, and the industry stops being all about time slots, the number of quality shows will go up dramatically.Just wait and see
who is lance bass dating :: lance armstrong contador  
Author Message
Chris snype
Guest
PostPosted: 10 16 2009    Post subject: lance armstrong still married Reply with quote
Abiogenesis FTW
I think he stated his point very clearly. I'll recap:a. this was pure jihadb. committed by an American c. on American soil d. against are troops.Draw your own conclusions.
Back to top
kyra sedgwick
Serwat
Guest
PostPosted: 10 15 2009    Post subject: kyra sedgwick Reply with quote
“Given that Apple does not install ssh and that ssh is only installed and configured by jailbreakers, that would be a neat trick.
Back to top
Serwat
Guest
PostPosted: 10 14 2009    Post subject: Online casinos free play Reply with quote
It's to add some culture to you pre-med robots.
Wow! An outdoor kitchen with grass! What will they come up with next?!
Back to top
Jennion
Guest
PostPosted: 10 12 2009    Post subject: kyra sedgwick Reply with quote
Is it just me, or does the use of outdated buzzwords like 'cyber' make this seem less credible.?
Yeah..prirog...TAHT ***** again. Let's give you some facts. Actual FACTS, shall we?Fox promoted the ***** out of this show before it aired. In the months leading up to its debut, you couldn't go morethan 2 commercial breaks without seeing a promo for it. And during the 2003 playoffs, you couldn't go more an 2 innings without seeing the home plate ad for it. (It was pretty much that and 24 the whole game) And at least twice a game Joe Buck or Tim McCarver hyped the show.It then aired to like 6 million viewers. It had a nice time slot. It STAYED at that time slot for most o the first season. Yet even with all the hype and a steady time slot, it went from 6 million viewers in week one to about 4 million viewers by mid-season. It lost a THIRD of its audience despite huge promotion and a steady time slot. (But wait...you claim that everyone who watches gets hooked.,)At this point EVERY other network would have cancelled the show. But Fox did not. After just six epsidoes of failing ratings, Fox gave it hte greenlight for a full season. And it tried EVERYTHING to get move viewers. It ran mini-marathons on Fox, and ran all day marathons featuring the entire series to that point on FX. It even gave it the best time slot on TV for a special episode. Right after American Idol. And before you embarrass yourself by talking about how American Idol is for girls...just know that American Idol has far more young males watching that Arrested Development EVER did. Therefore, while the demographics did not match up well, it DID give them a lot more viewers that might like hte show. nfortuantely, none did.Then, even after a terrible first season ratings wise, Fox not only renewed it. but they gave it another GREAT time slot. Right behind the network's best scripted show, The Simpsons. And after a small bump in ratings at the start of hte second season, it again went downhill. By the middle of the season season, its audiece was down almost 50% from series premier. (Again..for a show that EVERYONE loves when they watch it supposedly...that is strange.)The FACT is that Fox only stated moving the show around after any and every other network would have pulled hte plug. They simply were NOT going to waste a valkuable time slot on a show that was never going to draw more than 4 million viewers. It would monumentally ***** stupid (which is hwy you think they should have done it) to do so.By season 3, it shouldn't have been on the air in the firstplace. There is NO WAY you can be an Arrested Development fan and think that those four craptastic episodes with Charlize Theoron were worthy of the name Arrested Development. The hsow had becme nothing but a series of "wink wink" i njokes. How the ***** did the writers think hat new fans were going to enjoy a show when they didn't understnad 90% of the jokes because you had to see previous episodes to laugh? Sorry, but watching George Michael as hte Star Wars kid was funny ONCE. Not 6 times.But don't letthe facts get in the way. Just keep telling you that Fox (the ONLY netowkr that didn't pass on the show, by the way) is evil for giving you 55 episodes off the show, rather than ZERO. OR rahter than 12 which is what hte ratings really would have warranted.Keep telling yourself that hte time slot hurt them, hoping that no one calls you on your ***** lie since hte show was kept very steady for an entire season and dropped every ***** week.Keep telling yourself that your opinion is a fact. Keep tellingyourself that you are SMARTER than other who didn't like the show. Keep telling yourself that the show was filled with "Intelligent Humor" as if "I just blue myself" ISN'T the lowest form of low-brow humor.I GURANTEE you I was a bigger fan of the show in season 1 and was looking forard to it LNGbefore you even heard of the show. The thing is, I have common sense and logic and undersntad why the show failed and that it had nothing to do with time slots or promotion.Now...when you go and bury me like the weak minded little bitch that you are, actually REFUTE what I said. Here are the main points:1. HUGE promotional push during World Series...hwhich had the exact demographics that the show was looking for2. Failed ratings from week 2.3. Steady time slot for most of the first season.4. Promotional push mid season with FX marathons and mini-marahtons on Fox as awell as post American Idol time slot forhte Julia Louis Dreyfus episode. (Maybe if the producers realized how much Julia pretty rmuch RUINED every ***** scene she was in on Seinfeld with her horrible overacting they wouldn't have chosen this episode to be their showcase.)5. Renewing the show for a second season when every other network canceled shows with far better ratingsand potential.6. Good time slot for the start of season 2.7. third season renewal despite two seasons of continuously diminishing ratings and losing MILLIONS of dollars per year.8. 55 episodes paid for despite the fact that shows that lost far less money get cancelled after 22 episodes.You want to blame people for no Arrested Development season 4? Blame the cast and crew of Arrested Devleopment. They could have stayed on the air either on the WB or Showtime. But they would have had to take a paycut. And it sure as ***** is reasonable for an employer to asked employees to take a pay cut when the employee is LOSING money for the company. Hurwitz refused to producehte show for any cheaper. As a stockholder in Fox at the time, I would have been pissed if they kept a show on the air that was losing millions of dollars and had no hope of turning things around.
Back to top
Charl
Guest
PostPosted: 10 11 2009    Post subject: lauren conrad designs Reply with quote

which is time that would've been spent on the phone or sharing your home videos and photo albums with friends had facebook not existed.

kyra sedgwick surface lake bell
Back to top
Rodjanae
Guest
PostPosted: 10 10 2009    Post subject: kristin davis free porn Reply with quote
We're whalers on the moon...
Back to top
Syona
Guest
PostPosted: 09 12 2009    Post subject: how old is lance armstrong Reply with quote
If I was going to have a prank fake funeral I would at least sit in the coffin and jump out halfway through and pretend to be a zombie.
Back to top
Tharukesh
Guest
PostPosted: 09 09 2009    Post subject: kyra sedgwick Reply with quote
!
Back to top  
Stevens
Guest

 So you claim that Star Wars is better than Star Trek only if you discount half of the Star Wars movies? You can't have your cake and eat it too. 
Back to top
No new posts
9 User(s) are reading this topic (8 Guests and 40 Anonymous Users)
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   All times are GMT - 3 Hours
Page 1 of 1
Last messages
lauren conrad hairline braid kylie minogue sexy pictures kyra sedgwick barefoot
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group



Our friends kyra sedgwick/amazing grace leann rimes in church video