| sex tape kristin davis :: lady gaga the fame monster |
| Author |
Message |
Wellesley
Guest
|
Posted: 10 16 2009 Post subject: lyrics lady gaga poker face |
|
|
"Their XBox machines have NEVER made a profit."Did you get this info after a single search on Google, or did you actually do your... *GASP* Research!?!
I just saw bob dylan in concert and he was crap. It sounded like big band jazz music, nothing folky AT ALL! and he played the guitar once(horribly) and every guitar was electric.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Espie
Guest
|
Posted: 10 15 2009 Post subject: lauren conrad mtv |
|
|
|
“I don't think you can ask someone to prove something and also declare their failure to prove said thing in the same post.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Weidemoyer
Guest
|
Posted: 10 14 2009 Post subject: Online casinos free play |
|
|
45"... really? Pics?.
Sponsored by Dragon Age: Origins!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Logeswary
Guest
|
Posted: 10 12 2009 Post subject: lauren conrad mtv |
|
|
What's the name of that restaurant you like with all the goofy ***** on the walls and the mozzarella sticks??
@pln2bz: Who wrote this, I wonder? "The very origin of dark matter originated because galaxies were observed to be rotating far too fast on the outer edges -- almost as if the galaxy was a fixed plate."Surely it can't have been an engineer, can it? I mean, the rotation curve of a fixed plate is a straight line .. with a non-zero slope (i.e. it is not flat). Yet spiral galaxies have flat rotation curves (beyond a certain radius - "on the outer edges"), and it is this flat part which is so hard to explain using only the observed mass (stars, the interstellar medium). No engineer would make such a silly mistake, would they? |
|
| Back to top |
|
ROSHIK
Guest
|
Posted: 10 11 2009 Post subject: lady gaga nude gallery oops |
|
|
I'm a better Christian than you are, and I'm an atheist!

|
|
| Back to top |
|
Calliegh
Guest
|
Posted: 10 10 2009 Post subject: kylie minogue butt clips |
|
|
|
"Few people realize just how little money their favorite artists make off their own music, and the industry is only more paranoid and controlling now that digital piracy is rampant."Artists can still make money touring. The industry knows the only way they can make money is leeching/skimming off the artists. No wonder the industry is paranoid, they add minimal value and take the maximum, at the expense of artists. The present system needs to be blown up. If piracy achieves that end, then good for piracy. Do not feel bad about cheating a system that itself exists to cheat artists.Because the artist doesn't see any money until the record company's expenses for the album are recouped and the album becomes "profitable", it's common that artists never see any money from the sale of their albums. The recording industry's accounting system makes the movie industry's accounting look honest and respectable. (Think of all the movies that made hundreds of millions of dollars and then the studios refuse to payout a percentage of the profits because the movie was "unprofitable". The music industry is worse.) It's not unheard of for each sold album putting the artist further into the red due to unethical music accounting practices. In other words, the artist will never see a dime no matter how many album she sells.Many musicians are indifferent to music piracy because it's not like they saw any of the money from album sales anyways. Youtube, artists websites, direct marketing, touring - there will be a new model for artists to make money. We're still in the experimenting stage of what that will be. Read Fredric Dannen's "Hit Men" if you want to know more about the sickness that is the recording industry. It's entertaining reading and you'll understand how completely corrupt the business is.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Ziya
Guest
|
Posted: 09 12 2009 Post subject: did grant show and laura leighton date |
|
|
|
Basically the film get banned for going off-topic.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Jumiati
Guest
|
Posted: 09 09 2009 Post subject: lauren conrad mtv |
|
|
|
!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
EZRA
Guest
|
The way that science is reported now is not quite the same as it used to be. Before, in the 60s-80s, a lot of these research findings weren't available unless you were a researcher in the field. For a scientific advancement to reach the common people, generally it had to be commercialized. With the internet, findings can be published long before any hope of commercialization. And yes, it is frustrating to hear about all the amazing leaps forward that scientists are making only to be told that a viable commercialized product employing those discoveries is a good 15-20 years away. |
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| 9 User(s) are reading this topic (8 Guests and 40 Anonymous Users) |
|
 |
|