| javier bardem :: jayde nicole freeones |
| Author |
Message |
Flinda
Guest
|
 Posted: 10 16 2009 Post subject: jason priestley |
 |
|
Fair comment because if you died from it i certainly wouldn't care.
According to all the evidence, either it was completely psychogenic, or it was an elaborate hoax.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shritesh
Guest
|
| Posted: 10 15 2009 Post subject: jason priestley penis |
|
|
|
“Yes, yes it is.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Castiledo
Guest
|
| Posted: 10 14 2009 Post subject: Online casinos free play |
|
|
WTF is a fraggle?.
How do you know its sideways? You might be sideways.!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Tyler
Guest
|
| Posted: 10 12 2009 Post subject: jason priestley penis |
|
|
China will never agree to such a deal... This is exactly why Bush did not sign the Kyoto protocol. Seems that the current administration is in agreement. "Change"?
Most of them just need an outlet, that's why. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Lavonya
Guest
|
| Posted: 10 11 2009 Post subject: jenna haze twitter |
|
|
Its a number play. The number of unemployed is a lot higher. They are not counting people who are self-employed and out of work, because these people (like me) do not qualify for unemployment.Perhaps when the rate continues to rise people will realize that Obama and the Democrats are clueless. The "Stimulus" isn't working at all. It made NO SENSE at all for Obama to raise taxes on people who create jobs. Look at the insane taxes people who have companies that are S Corp types. Which is the bulk of small to medium businesses. Revenue they could be putting back into the business now goes to taxes.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Smith
Guest
|
| Posted: 10 10 2009 Post subject: jasmine fiore killed mob hit |
|
|
|
ebayby.com
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Chevari
Guest
|
| Posted: 09 12 2009 Post subject: who has jared leto dated |
|
|
|
I'd never seen the Malarchuk video...I have to say that was pretty disturbing and is probably going to be etched in my memory for awhile.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Manvith
Guest
|
| Posted: 09 09 2009 Post subject: jason priestley penis |
|
|
|
!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Vojoa
Guest
|
It is disingenuous and dishonest to call it a takeover. And if you're not being disingenous nor dishonest, you're being mislead. I suggest you actually read the bill, and look at the facts that led to this effort. I read the bill to fact-check a scare-letter e-mail a conservative friend of mine sent me. The bill is not the horrible thing Republicans claim it to be. You have to be willfully blind to conclude such a thing.There are 700,000 bankruptcies per year due to medical expenses--half of personal bankruptcies in the US.http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/what_is_the_ ... Tens of thousands Americans die unnecessary deaths due to the lack of access to affordable health care.http://www.factcheck.org/2009/09/dying-from-lack-o ...(Harvard estimates 45,000 preventable deaths due to lack of insurance *per year*.)Thousands upon thousands of insurance premium paying clients have had their legitimate claims denied or their plans dropped for unconscionable reasons, while health insurance corporation executives take home multi-million dollar sallaries, a fraction of which could have saved many lives:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKI9be55N00This bill brings long overdue consumer protections against abusive corporations who take advantage of sick people who have absolutely no leverage against them. The "free market" has been subverted by an oligopoly which hardly competes and only cares about the profit it brings its shareholders and administrators. Competition is what makes the market work for consumers. If public universities do not constitute a "take over" of the higher education system, don't you dare call this bill a take over. Just as public universities and colleges offer an affordable alternative to those who can't afford private universities, uninsured Americans ought to have access to affordable health care. If private enterprises don't rise to the task, it is unconscionable to fight tooth-and-nail to keep the government from meeting their needs. It is nonsensical for the Republicans to fight those who try to meet this need and claim to be "pro-life" or patriotic. Perhaps you'll understand if you're made to walk a mile in their shoes. |
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| 9 User(s) are reading this topic (8 Guests and 40 Anonymous Users) |
|
 |
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in