Jay z official, janet jackson lyrics, janet jackson live la,

Sherlita · Guest

Way to ***** all over @insanekoz happy moment @shaelen. I bet your a hit at children's birthday parties.
@magibeg. Just because there is a similar looking graph does not mean that one thing caused the other. There is a VERY good reason for believing the reverse - that the rise in temperatures has contributed to the rise in CO2 in the atmosphere. Yes, our burning of fossil fuels has also affected the rise in CO2 levels, there is no question there.I'm not saying that the activities of man are not affecting the climate. I'm sure that they are. I'm simply pointing out that it is a very complex system. There ARE factors other than CO2. We have gone into and come out of ice ages many times in the last couple of million years. Man has been witness to many of these events. The temperature swing of an ice age is 10 to 12 degrees. Compare that to the less than one degree of change that we've been witness to in the last 500 years.If it's all about CO2, answer me this... how did we come out of any one of these ice ages? How does the Earth cool, then warm, by 10 degrees without the devastating effects of man on the environment? Then ask yourself why our sudden and catastrophic effect on the CO2 of the planet has not caused warming in four out of the last seven decades? (hint: we cooled for 30 years, then warmed for 30 years, then cooled for ten.) Also ask why we are today about the same temperature as in 1935 and cooler than some parts of the 13th and 16th centuries?

Savage · Guest

“you forgot to add "/s" at the end of your comment.

Ranique · Guest

And what about the scientists running the LIGO interferometer experiment? Are THEY quacks? From "LIGO Sheds Light On Cosmic Event"..."LIGO's contribution to the study of GRB070201 marks a milestone for the project, says Caltech's Jay Marx, LIGO's executive director: "Having achieved its design goals two years ago, LIGO is now producing significant scientific results. The nondetection of a signal from GRB070201 is an important step toward a very productive synergy between gravitational-wave and other astronomical communities that will contribute to our understanding of the most energetic events in the cosmos.""Within an environment where mainstream scientists will eagerly call a NULL result "significant" and a "major milestone" presumably in the quest to get additional funding, what are we to make of the same people calling the aether interferometer experimenters quacks?Re: "Not only that but CERN and all the other particle physics groups were conducting experiments on the relativistic dynamics of particles up until the 80s until they decided it wasn't worth trying to find anything wrong with it anymore."From "The Invisible Universe" by Gerrit Verschuur ... "Many research scientists, especially the theoretically inclined, 'know' so much that their chance of making a lucky or creative discovery may be severely curtailed. If we know too much, our vision is sometimes narrowed to the point where new opportunities are not seen. Jansky knew a little astronomy, but not enough for it to get in his way and cause him to reject the possibility that radio waves originating from the cosmos might be real ... the new field of radio astronomy was originally caught between two disciplines. Radio engineers didn't care where the radio waves came from, and the satronomers, '... could not dream up any rational way by which the radio waves could be generated, and since they didn't know of a process, the whole affair was (considered by them) at best a mistake aned at worst a hoax.'"If more people would just read the stories of science that have led us to this current point, they'd have a much more honest view of the fallibility of establishment science.Re: "The point is that some established physics has such a weight of evidence behind it that it cannot be realistically challenged, and only modified in subtle ways."But, this is glossing over the social ramifiications of admitting that the past 100 years has been a mistake.Re: "Since we know general relativity works in certain circumstances (a fairly broad set of circumstances), then not only should a new theory reproduce the same results in that regime, but it should do it in a logical, consistent and simple way"It really all depends on how rigorous and creative scientists have been in ruling out possibilities. Today, there is so much emphasis placed upon consensus in science (like in cosmology) that it's not clear that all of the possible explanations are being ruled out..
your mom's flying sideways :P!

Roy · Guest

okay, fine, have it your way. It bunny-hopped to 10.2%.?
Ryan vs, Dorkman 1 is still the best fanfilm ever.Batman: Dead End is 2nd, but would have been better if the Batsuit were different. . .or at least not light grey. It actually cost $35,000 dollars to make and was shot professionally, which is amazing for a 100% free fanfilm.

Wynne · Guest

Hey now, you can't get a sensationalist story out of that. Let's reframe:"Holy !@%*#@% - FaceBook users invest over 10,800 <fontsize-12>seconds</fontsize> per year on the site!!!!!"See how much better that is? :)

Adebayo moses · Guest

Taking subsidies away from telephone companies helps Big Cable. That is their reason for suggesting this. The fact that it's a good idea is only secondary to their self interest.

Malahat · Guest

Boss...... I'm dog tired!

Jacinto · Guest

!

jasmine fiore nudes